Monthly Archives: January 2013

Peace vs. Justice

In the world of soft International Politics, the emergence of International Policing mechanisms, particularly the ones concerned with justice (such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), the International Criminal Tribunals (ICTR, ICTY), and a couple of other acronyms (SCSL, ICJ, ECCC)), have been subject to a debate that has pivoted around the issue of Peace vs. Justice. One of the early acts of the ICC was to indict Joseph Kony, the Ugandan Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) leader. In retaliation, Kony and the LRA upped their rampage and threatened that the LRA would have no other option but to continue the violence in Uganda if the ICC didn’t offer Kony amnesty in return for the LRAs participation in peace talks. Some felt that individuals should not be sacrificed for the sake of justice, others felt that an important precedent needed to be set if the court was going to be able to successful prevent other atrocities in the future.

Months after the Arab League’s asylum offer in July and Obama and Cameron’s clemency offering in exchange for Assad’s participation in peace talks, there has been renewed talk of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his family seeking political asylum. Apart from the problematic posturing of the Anglo-American leaders to be above International law, the Peace vs. Justice debate can be found at the heart of this decision for political asylum. For many, like Reuters columnist Bernd Debusmann, “The idea that the Syrian leader would leave with impunity is hard to swallow after 15 months (now 22 months) of brutal crackdown.” Others, like Prime Minister Cameron claim that while he would prefer Assad to be subject to International law and justice, but that the priority must be an end to violence and a transition in Syria that cannot begin to happen with Assad in place. So far, no word (that I can find) on what the thoughts are of Syrians and Syrian Rebel fighters on granting Assad asylum………

A Syrian refugee watches a television broadcast of Syria's President Assad speaking in Damascus, in their container at the Al-Zaatari refugee camp in Mafraq

Isola Ponte (Bridge Island)

Isola Ponte (Bridge Island)

isola ponteThe influx of asylum seekers does not ebb for holidays like Christmas (despite how shocking it might be to think of groups of people who have managed to avoid planning their schedules around Christmas, or any Chrisitian holiday for that matter). This triviality seems to have been lost on the Italians responsible for both processing asylum seeker claims and transporting refugees to detention centers on the peninsula. As a result, the reception center on the island of Lampedusa, which normally has room for 381 guests, was 600 strong on the 19th of December (6 full days prior to Christmas mind you). Lampedusa’s mayor, Guisy Nicolini, insisted that Lampedusa is an isola ponte, or bridge island, for asylum seekers – a landing site, a place of reception and first aid. Nicolini justified the necessity for Lampedusa’s reception center to remain empty so as to be better equipped at receiving those coming to it’s shores. Pragmatically speaking, asylum seekers do not intend to remain on the island Lampedusa but capitalize on its proximity to North Africa as an entry point to Europe. However, there is something interesting in the notion of offloading a group of individuals and making them someone else’s problem; there is something unnervingly bureaucratic about it. Then again, it is sensible to replenish one’s resources in order to be of continued service. Let’s hope that this Bridge Island will be a portal to better place (and a not U-Turn like it has been in the past).

Actions are illegal. Never people.

A talk that tugs at the heart strings and leaves you reflecting on insightfully made considerations – in true Ted fashion. Originally accessed the video via the blog Postcards From…. where the following was written by means of introduction:


Inspirational talk by Jose Antonio Vargas at TEDxMidAtlantic in October 2012. You can hear the story of Washington Post journalist, Pulitzer prize winner and undocumented migrant Jose Antonio Vargas in his own words. For some background on his coming out and the possiblebut daunting task of combining a successful career and the fear of being apprehended because undocumented read this article published in the The Guardian.





BEWARE all ye gay men who enter the Czech Republic seeking political asylum from homophobic discrimination; your penis will be hooked up to a machine that will monitor blood flow as you watch straight pornography. This will help the authorities make sure you aren’t lying about your sexual orientation and if you pass, you are granted the gift of asylum.


Of late, the Czech government has been taking heat from other EU countries, particularly the Austrian-based European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, over the violation of privacy that phallometric testing asylum seekers entails. What is striking to me, is how this serves as an absurd example of the pervasive  biopolitical reality that dominates the political asylum process in the EU.  In this case, the Czech authorities justified their invasive control of bodies and biology with political jargon about the need for security against terroristic asylum impostors. I couldn’t help but chuckle when reading about their verification technology though… a morbid sort of laughter I might add.

%d bloggers like this: